Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.3 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Vivo |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2021-01-26 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.70 x 3.00 x 0.40 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.94 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 2500.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 3840 x 1644 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 643 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 22.92 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia PRO has a general score of 94.3, which is much better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's 77.8 general score. These devices have Android OS, but Xperia PRO has older 10 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14. The Xperia PRO is better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, we must highlight that it's also noticeably older, thicker and just a bit heavier.
Xperia PRO has a lot better hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a sharper display than Xperia PRO, because although it has a little bit worse resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels and a lot worse screen pixels density, it also counts with a larger display.
Sony Xperia PRO has a much better storage capacity to install games and applications than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 512 GB internal memory capacity, the Sony Xperia PRO also has a SD card slot that admits up to 1 TB. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Sony Xperia PRO, and although they both have the same aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better battery performance than Xperia PRO, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Xperia PRO costs more than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.