Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 62.8 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 4.0.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-04-29 |
| 5.04 x 2.52 x 0.42 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black and White | Prism cube black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 330.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 342 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 MSM8260 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Scorpion (Dual-Core 1700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 220 (266 MHz) GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 26 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.10 MP + 1.30 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (29 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.69 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.2 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 410 hours standby time 8.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 1.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G is way better than Xperia SL, with a 90.8 score against 62.8. The Galaxy A51 5G is a incredibly heavier but somewhat thinner phone than Xperia SL. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the Galaxy A51 5G has older 11 version while Xperia SL has Android 4.0.4 version. Xperia SL has a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy A51 5G, although it has a bit worse display pixel density, a much lower 1280 x 720 resolution and a way smaller display.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a little faster processing unit than Sony Xperia SL, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM and more processing cores. The Galaxy A51 5G counts with a very superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xperia SL, because it has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy A51 5G counts with a lot better camera than Xperia SL, because it has a lot more MP camera in the back, a much better 3840x2160 video quality and a bigger aperture to capture better captures and videos in low light environments. Galaxy A51 5G has a much better battery life than Sony Xperia SL.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a little more expensive than Sony Xperia SL, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.