Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 66.1 | 71.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 4.1, 4.0.4 | Android 4.0 |
| 2012-10-01 | 0000-00-00 |
| 5.09 x 2.65 x 0.37 inches | 5.39 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 4.72 ounces |
| Black, Gray and White | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 125.00 | $ 100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 4.8 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 306 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 2 GB (500 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.37 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/2.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.8 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA |
| Micro SIM | Micro SIM |
| 7 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1850mAh Battery | 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 450 hours standby time 7 hours talk time | 200 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 3.76 | 4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket is slightly better than the Xperia TL, having a 71.5 score against 66.1. Both phones we are comparing here use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket has the previous 4.0 version and Xperia TL has Android 4.1 version. The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket body is just a little bit thinner and just a bit lighter than Xperia TL.
Xperia TL counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy S III Cricket, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1280 x 720 pixels, the Xperia TL also counts with a little higher pixel number per inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket features a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Xperia TL, because it has 16 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 64 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a little bit better processing power than Xperia TL, and although they both have the same number of cores and a 400 MHz GPU, the Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Sony Xperia TL takes a little bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket, and although they both have the same video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Sony Xperia TL also has a larger aperture to capture better low light images and videos and a camera in the back with a way higher 13 mega pixels resolution.
The Galaxy S III Cricket counts with a bit superior battery life than Xperia TL, because it has a 14% larger battery size.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Samsung Galaxy S III Cricket is also very cheap compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.