Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 63 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 4.3, 4.1, 4.0 | -- |
| 2012-08-29 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.16 x 2.70 x 0.34 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.48 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 195.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 319 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8260A chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.72 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.81 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1750mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 300 hours standby time 6.7 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.6 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 XL has a general score of 80.7, which is a lot better than Xperia TX's general score of 63. Google Pixel 3 XL is a extremely newer and a little bit thinner cellphone than the Xperia TX, although it's incredibly heavier. The Google Pixel 3 XL features a better performing processor than Xperia TX, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with a larger number of cores and a larger amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 3 XL has a little more vivid display than Xperia TX, because it has a lot larger screen, a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px and a lot more pixels per inch in the display. The Google Pixel 3 XL captures greater videos and photos than Xperia TX, because although it has a lesser mega-pixels back facing camera, it also counts with a way larger aperture and a lot better 3840x2160 video quality.
The Google Pixel 3 XL has a way bigger storage for applications and games than Sony Xperia TX, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a much better battery duration than Xperia TX, because it has a 3430mAh battery size.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Google Pixel 3 XL is also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.