Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 63 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| Android 4.3, 4.1, 4.0 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2012-08-29 | 2019-05-07 |
| 5.16 x 2.70 x 0.34 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.48 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 195.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 319 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8260A chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.72 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.81 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1750mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 300 hours standby time 6.7 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a has a general score of 78.8, which is way better than the Xperia TX's 63 general score. These phones come with Android operating system, but Google Pixel 3a has a more recent 11 version while Xperia TX has Android 4.3 version, providing you a couple nice extra features. The Google Pixel 3a design is newer and a little bit thinner than Xperia TX's, but it's somewhat heavier.
Google Pixel 3a counts with a bit faster processing unit than Xperia TX, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with 3 GB more RAM and a higher number of cores. The Xperia TX counts with a little sharper display than Google Pixel 3a, although it has a much worse pixel density, a little bit smaller display and a way lower resolution of 1280 x 720.
The Google Pixel 3a takes way better photos and videos than Xperia TX, because although it has a back camera with a worse 12.2 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a much higher video resolution and a much larger aperture to take better images in low-light environments. Google Pixel 3a features a superior memory for games and applications than Xperia TX, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 48 GB more internal memory.
The Google Pixel 3a features a way better battery life than Sony Xperia TX, because it has a 71 percent more battery capacity.
Google Pixel 3a is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.