Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 63 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| Android 4.3, 4.1, 4.0 | -- |
| 2012-08-29 | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.16 x 2.70 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.48 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 195.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 319 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8260A chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.40 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.81 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1750mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 300 hours standby time 6.7 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 is a lot better than the Xperia TX, getting an 83.8 score against 63. Although Samsung Galaxy A50 is incredibly heavier than the Xperia TX, it's thinner and also notably newer. Galaxy A50 features a better performing CPU than Sony Xperia TX, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with 6 more cores and more RAM memory.
The Xperia TX has just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A50, although it has a bit worse pixel number per inch of display, a way worse resolution of 1280 x 720 pixels and a much smaller display. Galaxy A50 takes way better photographs and videos than Xperia TX, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Galaxy A50 also has a lot more mega pixels back facing camera and a much bigger camera aperture.
Samsung Galaxy A50 features a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Xperia TX, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a really longer battery life than Xperia TX, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 costs a little more than Xperia TX, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.