Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2016-09-08 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 4.76 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Blue |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 319 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.5 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Droid Turbo has an overall score of 76.4, which is just a bit better than the Xperia X Compact's global score of 71.8. Although it's the best in our current comparison, it must be noted that it is also an older, a lot heavier and thicker phone. Motorola Droid Turbo has a lot better screen than Xperia X Compact, because it has a way higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels, a bit larger display and a much higher screen pixels density.
Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a bit better processing unit than Sony Xperia X Compact, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), and they both have 3 GB of RAM, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a graphics co-processor. The Sony Xperia X Compact counts with a bit better camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have a same size camera aperture and the same (Full HD) video quality, the Sony Xperia X Compact also has faster video frame rates and a more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
The Xperia X Compact counts with a lot bigger memory for applications and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same 32 GB internal memory capacity, the Xperia X Compact also has an external SD slot that supports up to 256 GB. The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Xperia X Compact, because it has a 3900mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.