Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-09-08 | 2024-08-08 |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.76 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 319 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.82 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.01 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 is much better than Xperia X Compact, with a general score of 81.2 against 71.8. Motorola Edge 50's design is noticeably newer and thinner, but way heavier than the Xperia X Compact. Sony Xperia X Compact has a much faster processing unit than Motorola Edge 50, although it has 5 GB lesser RAM memory and an inferior number of cores (although faster).
Motorola Edge 50 features a lot better screen than Sony Xperia X Compact, because it has a way bigger screen, a lot higher resolution of 1220 x 2712 and a better amount of pixels per inch in the display. The Motorola Edge 50 counts with much more storage capacity to install games and applications than Xperia X Compact, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 features a really longer battery life than Xperia X Compact, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 2700mAh. Motorola Edge 50 counts with a much better camera than Xperia X Compact, because it has a bigger aperture, a back-facing camera with a much higher 50 MP resolution, a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a lot bigger sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.