Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-08 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 4.76 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic indigo |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 319 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G Stylus is better than Xperia X Compact, getting a 79.7 score against 71.8. The Motorola Moto G Stylus construction is extremely newer and a bit thinner than the Xperia X Compact's, but it is notably heavier. Motorola Moto G Stylus has a little more vivid screen than Xperia X Compact, because it has a little bit greater pixel density, a really bigger screen and a lot higher 1080 x 2300 resolution.
Moto G Stylus counts with a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Xperia X Compact, because it has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Moto G Stylus features a little bit better hardware performance than Xperia X Compact, because it has a larger amount of RAM and more processing cores.
The Moto G Stylus captures much clearer videos and photos than Xperia X Compact, because it has a lot higher video resolution, a back-facing camera with way more megapixels, a bigger aperture to capture better captures and videos in poorly lited situations and a bigger sensor. Moto G Stylus counts with a way better battery lifetime than Sony Xperia X Compact, because it has a 48% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.