Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2016-09-08 | 2021-01-22 |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 4.76 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 319 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.01 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 has a global score of 84.7, which is much better than Sony Xperia X Compact's 71.8 general score. The Galaxy A32 construction is much newer and a little bit thinner, but also way heavier than Sony Xperia X Compact. The Xperia X Compact counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A32, because although it has a lot smaller display and a little bit lower resolution of 720 x 1280 pixels, it also counts with a just a little better screen density.
The Galaxy A32 counts with a little better performance than Xperia X Compact, because it has a larger number of cores and a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy A32 has much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xperia X Compact, because it has 64 GB internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A32 captures clearer videos and photos than Xperia X Compact, because it has a camera in the back with a much better resolution, a larger camera aperture and a lot higher 3840x2160 video quality. Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a much better battery life than Xperia X Compact, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.