Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2016-09-08 | 2019-09-04 |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.76 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 319 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A90 5G has an overall score of 90.5, which is way better than the Xperia X Compact's 71.8 global score. Galaxy A90 5G's body is extremely newer and somewhat thinner, but notably heavier than the Xperia X Compact. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a bit better processing unit than Sony Xperia X Compact, because it has a greater number of faster cores and 3 GB more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a bit sharper screen than Sony Xperia X Compact, because it has a much higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a lot bigger display and a just a little more pixels per screen inch. Galaxy A90 5G has a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Sony Xperia X Compact, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 96 GB more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G takes much clearer photographs and videos than Xperia X Compact, and although they both have a F2 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has a way more mega pixels back-facing camera, a larger back camera sensor and a lot higher (4K) video quality. Galaxy A90 5G counts with a very superior battery performance than Xperia X Compact, because it has a 67% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.