Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-09-08 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 4.76 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 8 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 319 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.82 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is slightly better than Xperia X Compact, with a 77.8 score against 71.8. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro construction is a lot newer and extremely thinner, but heavier than Xperia X Compact. The Sony Xperia X Compact has a way better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and 2 less processing cores (but faster).
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features an incredibly better screen than Sony Xperia X Compact, because it has more pixels per inch in the display, a lot better 2200 x 2480 resolution and a much bigger screen. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way bigger storage for games and applications than Xperia X Compact, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior camera than Xperia X Compact, because it has a much higher video definition, a larger diafragm aperture, a camera in the back with a lot better resolution and a lot bigger sensor shooting much higher quality videos and photos. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better battery duration than Xperia X Compact, because it has a 111% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.