Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-06-23 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.67 x 2.76 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a global score of 83.7, which is much better than Sony Xperia X Performance's global score of 72.3. The LG V50 ThinQ body is way newer and a bit thinner, but just a bit heavier than the Sony Xperia X Performance. LG V50 ThinQ features a bit better processor than Xperia X Performance, because it has a higher number of faster cores and a greater amount of RAM.
LG V50 ThinQ features a slightly better display than Xperia X Performance, because it has a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display, a bigger screen and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3120. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a better camera than Xperia X Performance, because although it has a camera with lot less mega pixels and a tinier back-facing camera sensor, it also counts with a much bigger camera aperture.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Sony Xperia X Performance, because it has 96 GB more internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB. The LG V50 ThinQ has a very superior battery performance than Xperia X Performance, because it has a 48 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.