Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2016-06-23 | 2021-01-22 |
| 5.67 x 2.76 x 0.34 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Metal | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 441 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 is much better than the Sony Xperia X Performance, getting a overall score of 84.7 against 72.3. Samsung Galaxy A32 is a notably newer phone than Sony Xperia X Performance, but it's a little bit thicker and somewhat heavier. The Galaxy A32 counts with a bit better processor than Xperia X Performance, because it has more RAM and more cores (but slower).
Xperia X Performance has a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a way better display pixels density and a better resolution of 1080 x 1920. The Samsung Galaxy A32 features a superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Sony Xperia X Performance, because it has 64 GB internal storage and a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy A32 counts with a very superior battery duration than Xperia X Performance, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2700mAh. Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a much better camera than Sony Xperia X Performance, because it has a back camera with much more mega pixels and a bigger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.