Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-06-23 | 2019-06-20 |
| 5.67 x 2.76 x 0.34 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A60 is better than Xperia X Performance, with an 82.3 score against 72.3. Samsung Galaxy A60's construction is much newer and just a little thinner than Xperia X Performance's, although it is just a little bit heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A60 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Xperia X Performance, because it has 4 more processing cores (but slower) and a higher amount of RAM.
The Xperia X Performance features a little bit better screen than Galaxy A60, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a bit lower 1080 x 1920px resolution, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch of screen. The Galaxy A60 takes much better videos and photos than Xperia X Performance, because although it has a smaller sensor and a way less megapixels back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better low-light photography and videos.
The Galaxy A60 features a greater storage capacity for applications and games than Sony Xperia X Performance, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal memory. The Galaxy A60 features longer battery duration than Sony Xperia X Performance, because it has a 26% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.