Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| 2016-06-23 | 2019-05-29 |
| 5.67 x 2.76 x 0.34 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A80 is better than the Xperia X Performance, getting a global score of 84.9 against 72.3. Galaxy A80's design is notably newer, but much heavier and a little bit thicker than Xperia X Performance. Galaxy A80 counts with a little bit better processing power than Xperia X Performance, because it has a greater amount of RAM and more CPU cores.
Xperia X Performance features a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 1920 resolution and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a little greater screen density. The Samsung Galaxy A80 counts with a better memory for apps and games than Xperia X Performance, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy A80 counts with a greater camera than Sony Xperia X Performance, and although they both have a F2 aperture, the Galaxy A80 also has a much better 48 MP resolution back facing camera and a larger camera sensor shooting higher quality photographs. The Samsung Galaxy A80 has a way better battery lifetime than Sony Xperia X Performance, because it has a 3700mAh battery size against 2700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.