Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2016-06-23 | 2017-02-24 |
| 5.67 x 2.76 x 0.34 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Gold |
| Metal | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy C9 Pro has a score of 81, which is better than Xperia X Performance's 72.3 score. Although the Galaxy C9 Pro and the Xperia X Performance were released only a couple of months apart, the Galaxy C9 Pro design is a lot thinner but heavier. The Xperia X Performance counts with a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same 1080 x 1920 resolution, the Xperia X Performance also counts with a little better pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Sony Xperia X Performance, because it has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB and 64 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a bit faster processing unit than Sony Xperia X Performance, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a higher number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has just a bit better camera than Sony Xperia X Performance, because although it has a way less mega pixels camera in the back, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better low light photos. The Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a much better battery duration than Xperia X Performance, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.