Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-06-23 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.67 x 2.76 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is just a bit better than Sony Xperia X Performance, getting a general score of 77.8 against 72.3. Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is notably heavier than the Sony Xperia X Performance, it's a lot thinner and incredibly newer. The Sony Xperia X Performance has a much greater hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has an inferior number of cores and lesser RAM.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way better looking screen than Xperia X Performance, because although it has a bit lower display density, it also counts with a much larger display and a much better resolution of 2200 x 2480. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro shoots much better photographs and videos than Xperia X Performance, because it has a larger aperture to take better low-light captures and videos, a much larger sensor taking lot better quality videos and photographs and a lot higher 50 megapixels resolution camera in the back.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Xperia X Performance, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better battery performance than Xperia X Performance, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.