Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.3 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Xiaomi |
| 2016-06-23 | 2018-08-29 |
| 5.67 x 2.76 x 0.34 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue and Red |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a general score of 85.5, which is better than the Xperia X Performance's overall score of 72.3. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 body is notably newer than the Xperia X Performance's, although it is a bit heavier and a little bit thicker. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features just a bit better screen than Xperia X Performance, because although it has a quite worse display pixel density, it also counts with a larger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2246 resolution.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xperia X Performance, because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 256 GB. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a little faster processing unit than Xperia X Performance, because it has more processing cores and 5 GB more RAM.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a much better camera than Xperia X Performance, because although it has a smaller sensor which provides a worse photo and video quality and a camera in the back with much less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to take better images and videos in low light environments.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Xperia X Performance, because it has a 48 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.