Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | |
| 2016-05-23 | 2017-10-19 |
| 5.63 x 2.72 x 0.30 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Blue and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2620mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 has a general score of 81.6, which is better than the Xperia X's 72.9 global score. The Google Pixel 2 construction is newer and just a little bit lighter, but also just a bit thicker than the Xperia X. The Google Pixel 2 features a bit sharper display than Xperia X. They have a greater quantity of pixels per inch in the display, the same 1080 x 1920px resolution and a display of the same size.
Google Pixel 2 has a greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xperia X, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity. Google Pixel 2 features just a bit better hardware performance than Sony Xperia X, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores (and faster).
Google Pixel 2 features just a bit better battery duration than Sony Xperia X, because it has a 2700mAh battery capacity against 2620mAh. The Sony Xperia X features a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light images and video, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Sony Xperia X also counts with a larger sensor providing a better image quality, a much higher 23 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and higher 60 frames per second video frame rate.
The Google Pixel 2 is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a lot cheaper, which makes it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.