Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2016-05-23 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.63 x 2.72 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Blue |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2620mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Droid Turbo has a score of 76.4, which is just a bit better than the Sony Xperia X's 72.9 global score. Although Motorola Droid Turbo is better than the Sony Xperia X, we must highlight that it is also an older, somewhat heavier and incredibly thicker cellphone. The Motorola Droid Turbo has a brighter display than Xperia X, because it has a higher pixel count in each inch of display, a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a little bigger display.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a little faster processor than Xperia X, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have 3 GB of RAM, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a graphics processing unit. The Sony Xperia X counts with much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have equal 32 GB internal memory, the Sony Xperia X also has a SD memory slot that allows up to 200 GB.
The Xperia X shoots clearer photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video quality and a same size camera aperture, the Xperia X also has a back-facing camera with more mega pixels and higher video frame rates. Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Xperia X, because it has a 49% more battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Motorola Droid Turbo is also cheaper than the Sony Xperia X.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.