Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2016-05-23 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.63 x 2.72 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Blue |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2620mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo is a bit better than Sony Xperia X, with a 77.9 score against 72.9. Even being the best we compare here, Motorola DROID Turbo is an older, a lot thicker and heavier device than Sony Xperia X. Motorola DROID Turbo features a bit better processing power than Sony Xperia X, because although it has 2 lesser processing cores , and they both have a 3 GB RAM, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with an extra GPU.
Motorola DROID Turbo features a better looking display than Sony Xperia X, because it has a little bit larger display, a higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a better pixels density. Sony Xperia X counts with a greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 200 GB.
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a very superior battery life than Xperia X, because it has a 3900mAh battery size. Xperia X counts with a bit better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality and the same aperture, the Xperia X also has faster video frame rates and a back-facing camera with a better resolution.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, Motorola DROID Turbo is also a bargain compared to others, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.