Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-05-23 | 2019-06-20 |
| 5.63 x 2.72 x 0.30 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2620mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A60 is better than Xperia X, with an 82.3 score against 72.9. The Samsung Galaxy A60 design is incredibly newer than the Xperia X's, but it is a bit heavier and just a bit thicker. Xperia X has a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel number per inch in the display.
The Galaxy A60 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Xperia X, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a higher number of cores. Xperia X captures slightly better photographs and videos than Galaxy A60, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same video resolution, the Xperia X also counts with faster video frame rate, a way more mega pixels back-facing camera and a larger back-facing camera sensor shooting better quality videos and pictures.
Galaxy A60 features more memory capacity to install games and applications than Sony Xperia X, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy A60 has greater battery performance than Xperia X, because it has a 30% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.