Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2016-05-23 | 2019-09-04 |
| 5.63 x 2.72 x 0.30 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Metal | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 205.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2620mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a score of 90.5, which is a lot better than Xperia X's 72.9 score. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is a extremely newer phone than Xperia X, although it's a lot heavier and just a bit thicker. Sony Xperia X counts with just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a really smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a little bit greater display density.
The Galaxy A90 5G features a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xperia X, because it has a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A90 5G has a bit better performance than Xperia X, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a higher number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G takes much clearer videos and photos than Sony Xperia X, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has a much better (4K) video resolution, a back camera with way more mega pixels and a larger back camera sensor capturing better quality videos and photos.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a way better battery performance than Sony Xperia X, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 2620mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.