Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2016-05-23 | 2017-02-24 |
| 5.63 x 2.72 x 0.30 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Gold |
| Metal | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2620mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is much better than the Sony Xperia X, with an 81 score against 72.9. Although the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is somewhat heavier than Sony Xperia X, it's just a little thinner and newer. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a bit better processor than Sony Xperia X, because it has a higher number of cores (and also faster) and 3 GB more RAM memory.
Sony Xperia X counts with a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 1920, the Sony Xperia X also counts with a quite greater display pixel density. Xperia X has a slightly better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same video definition, the Xperia X also counts with a much more mega-pixels camera in the back and faster video frame rates.
The Galaxy C9 Pro features a superior memory capacity for applications and games than Xperia X, because it has more internal storage and a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 256 GB. The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a way better battery duration than Xperia X, because it has a 53 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.