Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-05-23 | 2020-08-06 |
| 5.63 x 2.72 x 0.30 inches | 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mirage black and Mirage blue |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 205.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2620mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M31s has a general score of 88, which is a lot better than the Xperia X's score of 72.9. Samsung Galaxy M31s's design is incredibly newer than the Xperia X's, but it's thicker and noticeably heavier. Galaxy M31s has a bit faster CPU than Sony Xperia X, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a greater number of cores.
Xperia X features a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy M31s, because although it has a really smaller display and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920, it also counts with a just a bit better screen density. The Galaxy M31s has a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xperia X, because it has a SD extension slot that supports up to 512 GB and more internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy M31s shoots much better videos and photos than Xperia X, because it has a back facing camera with a way better resolution, a way larger camera sensor which provides a much better image and video quality, a bigger aperture for better images in poorly lited environments and a much better 3840x2160 video quality.
Samsung Galaxy M31s features a way better battery life than Xperia X, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.