Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-05-23 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.63 x 2.72 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 205.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 8956 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.82 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2620mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.56 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a little bit better than Xperia X, getting a general score of 77.8 against 72.9. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a noticeably newer and way thinner cellphone than Xperia X, but it is extremely heavier. Xperia X features a much better processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster) and 13 GB lesser RAM memory.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better looking display than Xperia X, because although it has a little lower count of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 and a much larger display. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a lot bigger memory for apps and games than Xperia X, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior camera than Xperia X, because it has a lot larger camera sensor shooting lot better quality photographs and videos, a camera with a lot higher 50 mega pixels resolution, a larger camera aperture and a much better video resolution. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a really longer battery duration than Xperia X, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Xperia X, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xperia X. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Xperia X, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.