Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | -- |
| 2016-07-24 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.46 x 3.11 x 0.33 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 192.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.16 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 21.50 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V20 is slightly better than the Sony Xperia XA Ultra, getting a score of 77 against 71. The LG V20 body is a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter than the Sony Xperia XA Ultra, even when both of them were only released with a couple of months difference. LG V20 has a little bit better display than Xperia XA Ultra, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per inch in the display.
Sony Xperia XA Ultra features a bit better processing unit than LG V20, because although it has lesser RAM memory, it also counts with 4 more processing cores. LG V20 counts with much more storage to store more apps and games than Sony Xperia XA Ultra, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and 48 GB more internal storage.
LG V20 features superior battery lifetime than Xperia XA Ultra, because it has a 3200mAh battery capacity. The LG V20 counts with a little bit better camera than Xperia XA Ultra, because although it has a camera in the back with a lot lower 16 mega-pixels resolution and a smaller sensor which offers a worse image and video quality, it also counts with a way higher (4K) video definition and a larger aperture to capture better photos and videos in poorly lited situations.
LG V20 not only is the best phones in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.