Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Vivo |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat | Android 14 |
| 2017-09-21 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Pink | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 380.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P20 MT6757 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 16 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP2 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3430mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a global score of 77.8, which is a little bit better than Sony Xperia XA1 Plus's score of 73.7. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has the older 14 version and Sony Xperia XA1 Plus has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro's construction is notably newer and incredibly thinner than Sony Xperia XA1 Plus's, but it is also heavier.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much more vibrant display than Xperia XA1 Plus, because it has a lot higher 2200 x 2480px resolution, a quite better screen density and a lot larger display. Xperia XA1 Plus features a much greater processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features much more memory to install games and applications than Xperia XA1 Plus, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes way better videos and photos than Xperia XA1 Plus, because it has a much bigger back camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and pictures, a larger camera aperture to take better captures and videos in low-light situations, a lot higher video definition and a much higher 50 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better battery life than Xperia XA1 Plus, because it has a 66% bigger battery capacity.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Xperia XA1 Plus, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xperia XA1 Plus. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy Xperia XA1 Plus, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.