Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| 2017-05-05 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.50 x 3.11 x 0.32 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P20 MT6757 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V20 is a bit better than the Xperia XA1 Ultra, getting a 77 score against 72.8. The LG V20 design is just a little thinner and a little lighter than Xperia XA1 Ultra, although both of them were released with only a couple of months difference. The LG V20 counts with a bit more vivid display than Xperia XA1 Ultra, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better amount of pixels per inch of screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
Xperia XA1 Ultra counts with a bit superior CPU than LG V20, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Xperia XA1 Ultra also has a higher number of cores. LG V20 takes much clearer pictures and videos than Xperia XA1 Ultra, because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor which offers a lower photo and video quality and a lot less MP resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture.
The LG V20 counts with a lot bigger memory for applications and games than Xperia XA1 Ultra, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal memory capacity. LG V20 features greater battery lifetime than Xperia XA1 Ultra, because it has a 3200mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.