Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.8 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-05-05 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.50 x 3.11 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Mystic indigo |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P20 MT6757 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP2 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G Stylus has a global score of 79.7, which is a bit better than Xperia XA1 Ultra's score of 72.8. The Moto G Stylus design is noticeably newer, but a bit heavier and thicker than Xperia XA1 Ultra. The Xperia XA1 Ultra has a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G Stylus. They have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Moto G Stylus features a bit more vivid screen than Sony Xperia XA1 Ultra, because it has a little bit bigger display, a little bit higher 1080 x 2300px resolution and a quite better number of pixels per inch in the screen. The Moto G Stylus counts with a very superior camera than Xperia XA1 Ultra, because it has a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality, a back facing camera with a way higher 48 mega pixels resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture.
Motorola Moto G Stylus has a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Xperia XA1 Ultra, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 512 GB and more internal memory. Moto G Stylus counts with a really longer battery performance than Sony Xperia XA1 Ultra, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.