Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Vivo |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-08-24 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.18 x 2.95 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 8 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3580mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.52 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xperia XA2 Plus is a little bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having a 78.6 score against 77.8. Both devices in this review use Android OS (Operating System), but Xperia XA2 Plus has the newer 8.0 Oreo version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version. The Xperia XA2 Plus design is a bit lighter than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it is noticeably thicker and was released 6 years before.
The Xperia XA2 Plus counts with a way better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better looking display than Xperia XA2 Plus, because it has a way larger screen, a lot higher 2200 x 2480px resolution, way more brightness and a just a little better screen density.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures much clearer photographs and videos than Xperia XA2 Plus, because it has a lot higher video definition, a back-facing camera with a much better resolution, a bigger aperture to capture better photos and video in low-light situations and a much bigger sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a lot bigger storage for apps and games than Sony Xperia XA2 Plus, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better battery life than Xperia XA2 Plus, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity against 3580mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.