Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.5 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-02-16 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.42 x 3.15 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3580mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is better than the Xperia XA2 Ultra, getting an 83.7 score against 75.5. The LG V50 ThinQ design is newer, somewhat lighter and thinner than the Xperia XA2 Ultra. The LG V50 ThinQ features a little faster CPU than Xperia XA2 Ultra, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with just a bit better looking display than Xperia XA2 Ultra, because it has a way better 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution, more pixels per inch in the screen and a little bit bigger display. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a way bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Xperia XA2 Ultra, because it has an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage.
LG V50 ThinQ features a bit superior battery life than Xperia XA2 Ultra, because it has a 12% larger battery capacity. The Xperia XA2 Ultra features a little bit better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate and a lot smaller camera aperture which is not nice for capturing photos or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xperia XA2 Ultra also counts with a camera with a lot higher resolution and a bigger sensor shooting better quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.