Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.5 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2018-02-16 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.42 x 3.15 x 0.37 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3580mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.52 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Droid Turbo is just a bit better than Xperia XA2 Ultra, having a overall score of 76.4 against 75.5. The Motorola Droid Turbo is an a lot older and somewhat thicker phone than Xperia XA2 Ultra, but Motorola managed to build it a lot lighter anyway. Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a brighter screen than Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a lot greater amount of pixels per screen inch.
Xperia XA2 Ultra features a much better memory to store more apps and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Xperia XA2 Ultra also has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB. Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a bit better CPU than Xperia XA2 Ultra, because although it has 4 lesser cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit.
The Motorola Droid Turbo has a bit longer battery lifetime than Xperia XA2 Ultra, because it has a 9 percent greater battery size. Xperia XA2 Ultra captures a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have a same size camera aperture and the same video resolution, the Xperia XA2 Ultra also has a back-facing camera with more mega pixels and better 30 fps video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.