Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.5 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2018-02-16 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.42 x 3.15 x 0.37 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3580mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is better than Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra, with a score of 90.5 against 75.5. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G construction is newer, thinner and just a little lighter than the Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra. Galaxy A90 5G counts with just a little better hardware performance than Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A90 5G also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Xperia XA2 Ultra counts with just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, although it has a bit smaller display, a quite worse pixels density and a quite lower 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a better camera than Xperia XA2 Ultra, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same video quality and a F2 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has a back facing camera with way more mega-pixels and a bigger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has much more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xperia XA2 Ultra, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB and more internal storage. The Galaxy A90 5G counts with improved battery lifetime than Xperia XA2 Ultra, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.