Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-02-16 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.42 x 3.15 x 0.37 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3580mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.52 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C9 Pro is a little bit better than Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra, having a score of 81 against 75.5. The Galaxy C9 Pro construction is somewhat lighter and incredibly thinner than Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra, even though it was released about a year before. The Xperia XA2 Ultra counts with a bit better processing unit than Galaxy C9 Pro, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Xperia XA2 Ultra features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy C9 Pro. They have a screen with the same size, the same exact resolution of 1080 x 1920 and a better count of pixels per screen inch. The Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra counts with a much better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low light photos, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a back camera with a lot better 23 mega-pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro features a superior storage for games and applications than Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 256 GB, the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro also has 32 GB more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro features just a little bit longer battery life than Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.