Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-02-16 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.42 x 3.15 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.80 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3580mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.52 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a general score of 77.8, which is a bit better than Xperia XA2 Ultra's 75.5 overall score. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a incredibly newer device, and it is also a bit lighter and extremely thinner than Xperia XA2 Ultra. Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra counts with a much more powerful processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 cores.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with an incredibly better screen than Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra, because it has a really bigger screen, a bit more pixels per display inch, a way brighter display and a lot better 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Xperia XA2 Ultra, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much longer battery performance than Xperia XA2 Ultra, because it has a 5700mAh battery size against 3580mAh. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better camera than Sony Xperia XA2 Ultra, because it has a lot higher resolution back facing camera, a much higher video resolution, a way bigger sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality and a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.