Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-02-16 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.59 x 2.76 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 508 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a general score of 77.8, which is slightly better than the Sony Xperia XA2's global score of 74.8. Even though the vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a lot heavier than Sony Xperia XA2, it's thinner and newer. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a lot better looking display than Xperia XA2, because although it has a just a little lower pixel quantity in each inch in the display, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 2200 x 2480px, a really brighter display and a way larger display.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has much more storage capacity for applications and games than Xperia XA2, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage. Xperia XA2 has a much better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a really longer battery performance than Sony Xperia XA2, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better camera than Xperia XA2, because it has a way larger sensor taking lot better quality photographs, a larger aperture to take better photography and video in poorly lited situations, a way better 7680x4320 video definition and a camera with a lot higher 50 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.