Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2017-06-01 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.14 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Pink, Red and Silver | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 801 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3230mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xperia XZ Premium has an overall score of 79.8, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Droid Turbo's general score of 76.4. Xperia XZ Premium's body is incredibly newer and noticeably thinner, but a little bit heavier than Motorola Droid Turbo. The Xperia XZ Premium counts with a little more vivid display than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a little bit bigger display, a greater pixels density and a lot better 2160 x 3840 resolution.
The Xperia XZ Premium counts with much more storage to store more apps and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 256 GB and 64 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola Droid Turbo has a bit faster processor than Sony Xperia XZ Premium, because although it has a lower number of cores and lesser RAM, it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit.
The Xperia XZ Premium has a little bit better camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, although it has a camera with a lower 19 mega-pixels resolution and a worse (4K) video quality, they both have the same camera aperture. Motorola Droid Turbo counts with longer battery lifetime than Xperia XZ Premium, because it has a 3900mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.