Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2017-06-01 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.14 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Pink, Red and Silver | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 801 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 10.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3230mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Sony Xperia XZ Premium is just a bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo, with a 79.8 score against 77.9. Although Sony Xperia XZ Premium is just a little bit heavier than the Motorola DROID Turbo, it's thinner and incredibly newer. Sony Xperia XZ Premium counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a little bigger screen, a better screen density and a much higher resolution of 2160 x 3840px.
Motorola DROID Turbo has a bit better CPU than Xperia XZ Premium, because although it has lesser processing cores and lesser RAM, it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit. Sony Xperia XZ Premium counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Sony Xperia XZ Premium also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 256 GB.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with longer battery life than Xperia XZ Premium, because it has a 21% more battery capacity. Sony Xperia XZ Premium shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, although it has a lower 3840x2160 video quality and a back camera with a lower 19 mega-pixels resolution, they both have a F2 aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.