Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2017-06-01 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.14 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black, Pink, Red and Silver | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 801 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.3 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3230mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 has an overall score of 84.7, which is slightly better than the Xperia XZ Premium's 79.8 score. Galaxy A32 is a much newer cellphone than Xperia XZ Premium, but it is a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker. Sony Xperia XZ Premium counts with a little better performance than Galaxy A32. Both have 4 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processor.
The Sony Xperia XZ Premium has a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher resolution of 2160 x 3840 pixels and a lot more pixels per display inch. Galaxy A32 shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Xperia XZ Premium, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy A32 also has a bigger camera aperture to capture better images and videos in low-light environments and a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 features much more storage to install games and applications than Sony Xperia XZ Premium, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a really longer battery life than Sony Xperia XZ Premium, because it has a 55% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.