Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-06-01 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.14 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Pink, Red and Silver | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 801 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 700 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 10.3 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3230mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Sony Xperia XZ Premium is a little bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with a 79.8 score against 77.8. Sony Xperia XZ Premium's body is lighter than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it is a lot thicker and was released many years before. Sony Xperia XZ Premium has a much better performing processing unit than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a little bit better looking screen than Sony Xperia XZ Premium, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels and a much lower count of pixels in each inch of screen, it also counts with much more display brightness and a really larger screen. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Sony Xperia XZ Premium, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Sony Xperia XZ Premium, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity against 3230mAh. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better camera than Xperia XZ Premium, because it has a lot more mega-pixels back camera, a much bigger sensor providing a lot higher image quality, a bigger aperture and a way better 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.