Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-10-02 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.88 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is much better than the Sony Xperia XZ, having a global score of 83.7 against 73.5. LG V50 ThinQ is a extremely newer cellphone than the Sony Xperia XZ, although it's heavier and just a bit thicker. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a slightly better display than Sony Xperia XZ, because it has a larger screen, more pixels per inch of display and a much better resolution of 1440 x 3120.
LG V50 ThinQ features a bit superior processor than Xperia XZ, because it has 3 GB more RAM memory and a greater number of cores. The LG V50 ThinQ has a lot bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Xperia XZ, because it has more internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V50 ThinQ features a way better battery performance than Xperia XZ, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. Xperia XZ captures clearer photographs and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has slower video frame rate and a much smaller camera aperture which is worse for low light images and videos, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Xperia XZ also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor and a back facing camera with a much higher 23 mega-pixels resolution.
The LG V50 ThinQ not only is the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also cheaper than the Sony Xperia XZ, which makes buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.