Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2016-10-02 | 2021-01-22 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 424 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 has a score of 84.7, which is much better than the Sony Xperia XZ's score of 73.5. Galaxy A32 is a incredibly newer device than the Sony Xperia XZ, although it is somewhat thicker and extremely heavier. Xperia XZ has a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a lot more pixels per display inch.
The Galaxy A32 has a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xperia XZ, because it has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 32 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy A32 counts with just a bit better performance than Xperia XZ, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a greater number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 has a way better battery duration than Xperia XZ, because it has a 72 percent more battery size. Galaxy A32 features a bit better camera than Xperia XZ, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A32 also has a way more mega pixels camera in the back and a larger aperture to capture better photography and video in low-light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.