Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| 2016-10-02 | 2019-05-29 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A80 is better than Sony Xperia XZ, having a score of 84.9 against 73.5. The Galaxy A80 is a extremely newer cellphone than the Sony Xperia XZ, but it is somewhat thicker and notably heavier. The Galaxy A80 has a little better hardware performance than Xperia XZ, because it has more RAM memory and a greater number of cores (and faster).
Sony Xperia XZ has a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a way smaller display, it also counts with a quite better screen density. Galaxy A80 counts with a little bit better camera than Xperia XZ, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same video frame rate and a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy A80 also has a larger camera sensor which offers a higher image and video quality and a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels.
Samsung Galaxy A80 counts with a better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xperia XZ, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A80 features superior battery duration than Xperia XZ, because it has a 28 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.