Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2016-10-02 | 2019-09-04 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Aluminum | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is much better than Sony Xperia XZ, having a 90.5 score against 73.5. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G construction is newer, but a little thicker and incredibly heavier than Sony Xperia XZ. Galaxy A90 5G and Xperia XZ feature very similar screens, because although the Galaxy A90 5G has a little bit worse amount of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features just a little better performance than Sony Xperia XZ, because it has more RAM and a higher number of faster cores. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Sony Xperia XZ, because it has more internal memory and an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy A90 5G shoots better photographs and videos than Sony Xperia XZ, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same video quality and a F2 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A90 5G also has a lot better resolution camera in the back and a bigger camera sensor which offers a higher image and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a very superior battery performance than Xperia XZ, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.