Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-10-02 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 282.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has an overall score of 77.8, which is just a bit better than Xperia XZ's score of 73.5. Even though the vivo X Fold 3 Pro is noticeably heavier than Xperia XZ, it's notably thinner and notably newer. The Xperia XZ has a very superior hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 4 less cores and a lower amount of RAM.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better looking display than Xperia XZ, because although it has a little lower amount of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a much larger screen and a lot higher resolution of 2200 x 2480px. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior camera than Xperia XZ, because it has a camera in the back with way more MP, a lot better video resolution, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much better image quality and a larger diafragm aperture for better low-light captures.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games than Sony Xperia XZ, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 480 GB more internal memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better battery life than Xperia XZ, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Xperia XZ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Xperia XZ. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Xperia XZ, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.