Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-10-02 | 2021-04-02 |
| 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 282.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 23.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X60 Pro has a global score of 78.8, which is slightly better than the Sony Xperia XZ's 73.5 score. Vivo X60 Pro is a way newer and a little thinner cellphone than the Sony Xperia XZ, although it is also just a little bit heavier. The vivo X60 Pro has a faster processor than Sony Xperia XZ, because it has more RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit more vivid screen than Sony Xperia XZ, because although it has a quite worse screen pixel density, it also counts with a larger display and a quite better 1080 x 2376 resolution. Vivo X60 Pro counts with a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xperia XZ, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Vivo X60 Pro features a superior battery life than Xperia XZ, because it has a 45 percent greater battery capacity. Vivo X60 Pro counts with a much better camera than Sony Xperia XZ, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the vivo X60 Pro also has a larger back camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photos, a larger aperture, a lot higher 48 MP resolution back camera and better 60 fps video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.