Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-10-01 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and Silver | Aurora black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 319 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is better than Xperia XZ1 Compact, having a general score of 83.7 against 74.6. LG V50 ThinQ's body is newer and thinner, but much heavier than the Xperia XZ1 Compact. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit faster processing unit than Xperia XZ1 Compact, and although they both have 8 cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a better looking display than Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has a lot bigger screen, a way greater pixels density and a way better 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has 96 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB.
LG V50 ThinQ has a way better battery performance than Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 2700mAh. Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact takes just a bit better photos and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a much smaller camera aperture which is not good for low-light captures and videos and worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing higher quality videos and pictures and a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the LG V50 ThinQ is also a bargain compared to the other phones, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.