Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.6 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Sony | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2017-10-01 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.08 x 2.56 x 0.37 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and Silver | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 319 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 19.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.64 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo is just a bit better than Xperia XZ1 Compact, having a 77.9 score against 74.6. Motorola DROID Turbo's construction is incredibly older, somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier than Xperia XZ1 Compact. The Motorola DROID Turbo features a much better looking screen than Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has a lot more pixels per inch of display, a quite larger display and a much better 2560 x 1440 resolution.
Sony Xperia XZ1 Compact has a quite bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB. The Motorola DROID Turbo has just a bit better processing power than Xperia XZ1 Compact, because although it has lesser cores and 1 GB less RAM, it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor.
The Xperia XZ1 Compact features a slightly better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, although it has a back camera with less MP resolution and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, they both have a same size aperture. The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a superior battery life than Xperia XZ1 Compact, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity instead of 2700mAh.
Motorola DROID Turbo not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.